Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Heuberger

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) GSS (talk) 15:45, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Martin Heuberger

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of passing WP:GNG. Contains only two sentences. Only used source is routine coverage. T v x1 12:13, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep- Article is a stub but it doesn't mean subject is non-notable. He was the head coach of German national handball team from 2011 to 2014. Plenty of coverage in German sources to pass WP:GNG. [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8] and there are many more. Hitro talk 17:59, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - He coached a major national team at a World Championship and reached the quarterfinals. The article could be longer, but AFD is not cleanup and the article has potential so there's no reason to delete it because of its present state. Smartyllama (talk) 12:59, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:18, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:18, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – Indication of passing WP:BASIC is presented above in the sources posted by hitroMilanese. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:19, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per HitroMilanese, as he appears to pass the WP:GNG and WP:BASIC requirements. Ejgreen77 (talk) 22:50, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep All was said. I believe i know why it was listed here but whatever. He meets GNG as said above... Kante4 (talk) 10:28, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment To all those keep voters. I did not nominate this article because I think the subject is not notable, but because there is no indication (and certainly no proof) of notability in the article. Notability should not only be assumed, it should also be demonstrated in the article. If this article had been proposed in this state through articles for creation, there is no chance it would have been accepted. This article is currently more suitable for a draft then a main space article. I invite all these keep voters to actually work on it to improve instead of just voting to keep while leaving it in its sorrow state. If improved, perhaps I might reconsider my nomination. T v x1 13:53, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your suggestion. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the "edit this page" link at the top. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:56, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Does not change the fact, that he meets GNG as mentioned. It can/should be expanded, yes. But not deleted. Kante4 (talk) 14:27, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Just because there's no real proof of notability in the article, doesn't mean it's not notable. Notability isn't about the sources in the article, but rather, the coverage that's out there. See WP:BEFORE. Omni Flames (talk) 05:03, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.