Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Armand

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per consensus and as an unsourced BLP. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Martin Armand[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unfortunately, while there are plenty of Google hits, I can't find anything on this person that could be called reliably sourced. Drmies (talk) 14:23, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:43, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:43, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:44, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - As per nom, I couldn't fine any RS either. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:38, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Gave it a shot, the usual sources (quite a bit of digging through self-published sources, trying to verify an alleged 2001 article in the National Post without success, CREDO), came up so far with nothing. The 2001 article, if verified, would possibly get us halfway to GNG.--joe decker ^{talk to me} 03:14, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per nom, unsourced. Spada II ♪♫ (talk) 11:32, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.