Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marta Grigorieva

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:50, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Marta Grigorieva[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources sinces february, doesn't appears to be relevant either DieBuche (talk) 21:49, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:08, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:08, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article reads like an advertisement, but there is a write-up in the Ham and High, a quite respectable local newspaper despite (surprisingly) not having a WP article. Not in iself enough for a keep, but willing to change my vote if other sources can be found.--Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 21:52, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Only one substantial reference in a reliable (but local) source; insufficient notability. Pburka (talk) 20:38, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete' - insufficient coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. I can find no other coverage in reliable sources aside from the Ham High already noted. -- Whpq (talk) 16:40, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.