Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marrickville Metro

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:G4. See: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marrickville Metro Shopping Centre Shirt58 (talk) 09:07, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Marrickville Metro[edit]

Marrickville Metro (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Re-creation of a deleted article, twice deleted under this name and once under name, which was deleted in AFD debate Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marrickville Metro Shopping Centre. Notability is unlikely to be any different. A speedy delete (WP:G4) was removed by the author. Ajf773 (talk) 02:26, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 02:27, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 02:27, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Still a non-notable mall. I have also restored the speedy delete tag, an author cannot remove such a tag from an article he/she created. WWGB (talk) 05:43, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • speedy delete the author removed the speedy delete tag I put. Clear recreation of recently deleted. The author has a track record of removing deletion notices and has even been caught out with sockpuppets in deletion discussions. LibStar (talk) 07:06, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: there might possibly be some indication that this is more than a run of the mill shopping centre: it was the site of one of the first Aldi in Australia (referenced in the article http://www.abc.net.au/7.30/stories/s238058.htm); that the centre management building is a "Heritage listed Mill House" (no mention I can see in an search on the Office of Environment and Heritage (New South Wales) website; that it was built on what had previously been the "Vicars Woollen Mill" - see http://adb.anu.edu.au/biography/vicars-sir-william-9273 - but no mention in the article. I also had some happy shopping days there when I lived in Sydney. (That, of course, fails WP:CHERCEZLAFEMME)--Shirt58 (talk) 08:21, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.