Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marlow Amateur Operatic society

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete non-notable amateur group. ---Balloonman ^{NO! I'm Spartacus!} 07:05, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Marlow Amateur Operatic society

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable, non-professional musical ensemble. Google searching turns up nothing to support WP:MUSIC or WP:ORG requirements. Joal Beal (talk) 12:33, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:35, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:35, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I agree with the original nomination. Cool Hand Luke 16:21, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this music ensemble. Joe Chill (talk) 21:39, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I am still editing/making this page and we do have music - we perform 2 chior concerts and a musical each year.

Steven131 (talk) 08:03, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 13:59, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no sources to establish notability. Their website doesn't even allow for access without login!--70.80.234.196 (talk) 19:23, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: depends what broswer you are using. the website isnt coded for chrome or anything apart form internet explorer. if you use anyother broswer you may need to login but it wont display properly. the only part of the website you actually need to login to is the members section.

Steven131 (talk) 14:06, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, Steven, I'm crossing out your "keep"; you only get one !vote.--MelanieN (talk) 00:55, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I am totally in favor of amateur choral groups and of what we in the States call "little theater". I'm in an amateur choral society myself, and I have taken part in amateur theatrical productions; however, they weren't "notable". Not every such group is notable enough for a Wikipedia article. Notabliity requires that there be outside sourcing about the group, such as reviews or human-interest stories in the newspaper. And I can't find any such. Sorry. --MelanieN (talk) 00:55, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.