Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marlon Magtira (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No evidence of notability, and WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE RL0919 (talk) 23:03, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Marlon Magtira[edit]

Marlon Magtira (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced BLP. Previously survived AfD in 2006. Talk page says:

‘Please keep the deletion page. This is obviously a page of blatant self-advertisment, self-friendstering, and self-wikipedia-ing. This person is not even that significant to be in this page. Please delete. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 61.9.74.18 (talk) 19:18, 27 April 2007 (UTC).

and

This is Marlon Magtira. Please delete this entry. My son (11) and daughter (9) was tinkering on Wikipedia and it was them who actually made the entry. I'm very sorry if this entry has made an issue of self-advertisement/self-friendstering/self-wikipedia-ing. I am insignificant but definitely not a moron. Please delete. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marlonmagtira (talk • contribs) 08:11, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Mccapra (talk) 21:09, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 21:09, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 21:09, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 21:09, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 21:27, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 21:27, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete and salt at subject's request? and no sources. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:36, 2 August 2019 (UTC).[reply]
  • I was strongly tempted to speedy delete this, having seen that the same two people in 2007 and 2008 edited the first AFD discussion page long after the discussion had closed in 2006. However, I then saw that the article had been significantly revised and updated in 2015, albeit by a person that, from the account name, clearly knew the subject; citing no sources whatsoever, and undoing the prior wikification. I am inclined to let a full AFD discussion run, as comments by the subject and others in 2008 and 2006 possibly do not apply to the 2015 version of the article, and the subject now. That said, no sources at all, with external hyperlinks that are not to sources, for 13 years is long enough for a biography and if that does not change by the end of the AFD discussion period we should delete. Uncle G (talk) 14:16, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - The article's history is a bit unusual, but it has been around for more than a decade and still makes no claims of notability. I failed to find any substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:06, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I don't think we need to pass the salt, but we do have WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE and per my BEFORE I'm not seeing sources establishing GNG here. Icewhiz (talk) 15:38, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete a non-notable journalist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:08, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - He is not a notable journalist. I did not find any reliable independent sources or substantial coverage. - MA Javadi (talk) 22:10, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.