Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marlie Collins
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 19:15, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Marlie Collins (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not enough evidence of notability under the rules for actors or singers. Much of her acting work is small background roles and her music album received no media notice. In both endeavors, the only sources found are routine listings in agency sites and retail/streaming services, with very little significant and reliable media coverage. Also note that the article makes no statement of notability, so it may also be an attempted promotion. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 13:35, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 13:36, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 13:36, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 13:36, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 20:42, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - none of her acting (including, I'd say, her voiceover work) satisfied WP:NACTOR, as it's almost entirely episodic. She's even further away from satisfying WP:MUSICBIO, since almost nothing came up in a BEFORE sweep on that, certainly not reliable/independent. No obvious redirect target. Nosebagbear (talk) 11:37, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete No significant sources to pass WP:NACTOR of WP:GNG. Hninthuzar (talk) 17:01, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete: Clearly fails the WP:GNG, WP:NACTRESS, and WP:MUSICBIO. -- LACaliNYC✉ 22:45, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination on account of subject failing WP:ACTOR. -The Gnome (talk) 11:36, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.