Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marlabs
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 16:44, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Marlabs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails to meet notability requirements. Most third-party online coverage consists of paid articles, press releases, etc. UnstableAngina (talk) 19:54, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete No coverage apart from passing mentions and routine business announcements. Kleuske (talk) 10:18, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 15:07, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 15:07, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 15:07, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 15:07, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 15:07, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 15:07, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comment @Rajendra menon: The current article doesn't actually say why the subject is notable. Please expand it to explain that and it may have a chance of not being deleted.Accesscrawl (talk) 15:54, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete The article doesn't make a meaningful claim of notability and no sources could be found in a Google search that would support such a claim. Alansohn (talk) 21:12, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Fails GNG with no significant references. ~EDDY (talk/contribs)~ 23:37, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with above, topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP HighKing++ 16:20, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.