Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marko Modic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 17:29, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Marko Modic[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of meeting WP:notability requirements. Only source is his own website. Google searches find nothing notable. Disputed prod. noq (talk) 15:20, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 17:04, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I've added a couple of ref links to his exhibitions in the UK in the 80s-90s. There is also evidence of a critical monograph, probably originally in English as the credited writer is/was an active art critic in the UK at that time, but I haven't located an English version. (But I'm not sure this is enough for WP:ARTIST criterion 4.) AllyD (talk) 17:21, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I've added some links to the Museums and Galleries where it is claer that Mr Marko Modic had an exhibition. And I've changed the introduction text, with references from where the text is cited. I would be glad to know if I have to add/change anything else. Thanks for advice.3xdvanajst (talk) 19:01, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. According to [1], "the world art circles ascribe him a special position due to originality, difference and the colorfulness of his art works". He had a large retrospective exhibition in the Whyte Museum, Canada, in February 2011,[2][3] and another one in Tivoli, Ljubljana (125 photos).[4][5] He has been described as one of the most prominent and world-wide known Slovenian artists by several reliable sources.[6][7][8][9] I believe he meets the WP:ARTIST criteria 1 and 4b and is notable in general. --Eleassar ^{my talk} 20:34, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per Eleassar and my own research. SarahStierch (talk) 22:02, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:58, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.