Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marklund (not-for-profit)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:46, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Marklund (not-for-profit)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems a very promotional article that fails WP:NONPROFIT. The only coverage I found was in local papers which do not meet the audience requirements of NONPROFIT. Given that their's quite a bit of coverage from Northern Illinois, I felt an AFD discussion was merited. Tagged for notability since May 2009. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 13:50, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 13:50, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disability-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:54, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:54, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Worthy organisation, but not notable. I couldn't see the coverage to make it so, or an WP:ATD. Boleyn (talk) 09:00, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Could reasonably be deleted under WP:G11. At least based on the sources in the article, fails WP:NORG by a mile. I note that extensive work was done on this by a now-blocked PR account, and another WP:SPA (Fourbrue12) which I'll bet my mop was a sock of MarklundPR, and an IP which (surprise, surprise), reverse-translates as mail.marklund.org. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:05, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.