Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Markalite
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete -Djsasso (talk) 14:40, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Markalite (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This element of fiction does not establish notability independent of its series. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, it is just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 22:37, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Plot summary and trivia for some sort of fictional device. No evidence of notability via substantial coverage in reliable, independent sources. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 02:44, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Seems to be an important device used in multiple films. Such are best handled with an independent article, or a merge to a combination page to an article on the weapons for the series. A proper search, might show references in reviews, and I see no evidence that it was actually undertaken. Perhaps it should be required for a nomination asserting no RSs. (note that would be a policy change. I think the frquency of bad nominations here on all sorts of subjects from different people seems to show how it would help. I've just now proposed it on the AfD talk page.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by DGG (talk • contribs)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:26, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per its in-universe notability to either The Mysterians or Toho. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 23:10, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, treelo radda 01:47, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hersfold (t/a/c) 06:35, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no sources, nothing reliable found via Google. And concerning DGG's comment above, it's the responsibility of those who want to include something in Wikipedia to come up with sources. Even worse, the article asserts that the guns in other Toho sci-fi films went by other names; claiming that they're all the same weapon seems original research. Huon (talk) 14:40, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, plot summary with no reliable sources. The burden of proof is on those seeking content to be included. Stifle (talk) 08:51, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.