Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Sibbald

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC(talk) 03:44, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Sibbald[edit]

Mark Sibbald (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 07:55, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • 20-Mule-Team Delete: Backup goalie with an ephemeral career in the semi-pros. Overwhelming failure of NHOCKEY and no evidence this meets the GNG; even by Dolovis' "standards," this a bit outrageous, and the only excuse I can think of is he was hoping no one would ever notice. Ravenswing 12:24, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Its the awards. He was on a streak for awhile creating articles for anyone who won an award because at one point any award from any minor league worked for NHOCKEY. This was one of the many Dolovis loop holes we closed. -DJSasso (talk) 17:54, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Another Dolovis creation for an SPHL All-Star with no other notability or secondary coverage. Yosemiter (talk) 15:44, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:55, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:55, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:55, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:55, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.