Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Rooks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Mo0[talk] 04:04, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Rooks[edit]

Gushy vanity. 1 and a bit pages of Google references for "Mark Rooks" "fire ball", none of them asserting any notability. Gushy "comments" in the talk page are actually by the page creator. Randwicked Alex B 03:21, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I loves me some video games, but I can't see this guy being notable. Not only does it not really make a case for this, it doesn't make a case for his flight simulators being notable, either. --InShaneee 03:51, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as vanity biography. -- Saberwyn - The Zoids Expansion Project 04:15, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No sources or citations of merit. (aeropagitica) 12:46, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, awful even as far as vanity articles go :) Mushin ^talk 17:46, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Vanity, per nom --Nick123 ^(t/c) 21:37, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Kuru 01:16, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.