Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Helm (lawyer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 14:23, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Helm (lawyer)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm unable to find any significant coverage of the subject. Bilby (talk) 11:31, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Bilby (talk) 11:31, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and Utah. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:10, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I also cannot find any significant coverage about this attorney. voorts (talk/contributions) 16:56, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.