Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Guglielmo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:11, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Guglielmo[edit]

Mark Guglielmo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There's nothing here that crosses the bar of WP:CRIMINAL. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:19, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 10:34, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 10:34, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 10:34, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails GNG BlackAmerican (talk) 16:51, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - clearly notable and passing WP:GNG and CRIMINAL. However, the article is a mess, and needs sourcing. but bad article quality is not a reason for deletion.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:42, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. How is this anything but a routine, if grisly, murder? Clarityfiend (talk) 06:37, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Deleete nothing about the murder or coverage that raises it to the level of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:01, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as I also am not finding anything to suggest both the needed substance and depth for both a convincing and improved article. SwisterTwister talk 05:48, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.