Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Burger

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:54, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Burger[edit]

Mark Burger (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This should have been speedy deleted several years ago, but the nominator reversed himself, so I thought I'd be polite and bring it here instead. The subject appears to be a thoroughly average Catholic priest in the US. Nyttend (talk) 23:29, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - the subject spoke at priestly conferences - not notable - and apparently published a book, for which we have no source. I'm guessing it's not a best-seller, or widely available. --Pete (talk) 23:46, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • It definitely exists, but as a self-published book, it obviously wasn't a best-seller and isn't widely available; see its WorldCat record. Nyttend (talk) 23:59, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete No evidence of notability. LaMona (talk) 05:48, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Not notable member of the clergy....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 16:14, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as mentioned above, simply nothing for a better article it seems. SwisterTwister talk 18:29, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I found one source, however this would be considered primary since it looks like it's published via the Church, who would of course have an obvious interest in writing about its clergy. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 06:10, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.