Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marjorie Silverman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 21:16, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Marjorie Silverman

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Silverman's positions at Barnard College as Associate Dean of the College, Dean for Student Development, and Adjunct Professor of Psychology do not appear to satisfy the requirements of the most promising provision of Wikipedia:Notability (academics) : "6. The person has held a highest-level elected or appointed academic post at a major academic institution or major academic society." The publication record does not seem to satisfy the guideline either. She seems to be a fine and productive college administrator, but that is not enough. Edison (talk) 18:37, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 18:39, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: as non-notable academic; fails WP:GNG; seems like promo-pushing to me. Quis separabit? 19:20, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

" Delete I'm not seeing notability here, as a scholar or as an administrator.E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:33, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:59, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:00, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now as although Books and Scholar seemed to have found some results, there's not much to suggest better improvement but feel free to draft and userfy. SwisterTwister talk 05:45, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No actual claim of notability. Agricola44 (talk) 20:32, 16 September 2015 (UTC).[reply]
Weak delete - arguably, being dean of students at a leading college, and working to fix the Furman center therein, are allegations of notability, but sources don't let her pass WP:GNG in any case. Bearian (talk) 19:04, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.