Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marion Romanelli

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 01:01, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Marion Romanelli

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. Paul Vaurie (talk) 03:31, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Paul Vaurie (talk) 03:31, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Paul Vaurie (talk) 03:31, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. feminist (+) 16:21, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:22, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:24, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - as well as the sources already in the article, I can find a few more to help meet WP:GNG. There's Meilleur Espoir de D1 : Marion Romanelli !, D1 Arkema : Marion Romanelli (Montpellier) annonce sa retraite à seulement 23 ans, Marion Romanelli, le rêve bleu, Marion Romanelli : « Cette sélection je ne m’y attendais vraiment pas », Coupe du monde U20, les Bleuettes sont «comme sur un tremplin» pour Marion Romanelli, Rupture des ligaments croisés pour Marion Romanelli avec les Bleues, etc... NHCLS (talk) 08:47, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sources above. Seany91 (talk) 09:26, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep meets GNG per sources above. Article needs improving, not deleting. Giant Snowman 20:13, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep - to be quiet honest, this was the more controversial nomination I made and I wasn't sure if it met GNG or not. I agree it does meet it with the sources provided. I retract my nomination. Paul Vaurie (talk) 23:50, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.