Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mario War

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:48, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mario War[edit]

Non-notable fanmade game, fails WP:SOFTWARE. Andre (talk) 00:28, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Two-sentance substub about a freeware game, no claims to notability included. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 01:12, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, NN --Steve 01:28, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- Ig yqzs 01:55, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. -- moe.RON ^{Let's talk | done} 01:56, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Itsa me Delete Danny Lilithborne 01:56, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. EVula 05:03, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete with a lightning powerup. Daveydw ee b (^chat/_patch) 05:25, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete - Red koopa shell this non-notable unverifiable fan game post haste! The Kinslayer 10:15, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I don't know about red koopa shell, maybe green shell it. I say delete as per nominator and Starblind. 147.10.248.218 12:51, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry that was me but I didn't realize I wasn't logged in. James086^{Talk | Contribs|Currently up for Editor Review!} 12:55, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete Stub about a fan game, need I say more? Outlaw640 14:21, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I find the article notable. Rōnin 22:33, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Would you care to share why? I'd be happy to change my vote if presented with adequate evidence. EVula 04:59, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Self-published things are rarely notable. Self-published items either need to have multiple major outside and independent sources of recognition. (Or the author has to be notale, though in that case, the self-published item should likely be described on the author's page.) --Kunzite 05:02, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Looks like it fails WP:V, WP:RS. Wickethewok 19:33, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.