Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mario Party 9
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was } delete per WP:SNOW and WP:CRYSTAL. PeterSymonds (talk) 21:44, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Mario Party 9 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Article about a potential video game that violates WIKIPEDIA:NOT; Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. TheMile (talk) 01:49, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Even the text of the article makes it clear this hasn't been announced. Erechtheus (talk) 01:58, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:NOTCRYSTAL, WP:OR; no citations to anything supporting the speculation. Townlake (talk) 02:09, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete. Looking into the crystal Wii controller without any citations. The article can be recreated once there are reliable sources about the upcoming release, but that wouldn't seem to be any time in the near future. —C.Fred (talk) 02:19, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Maxamegalon2000 05:43, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The creator is right - it's highly likely this game will be made. But without an announcement and/or discussion in reliable sources it's just a blatant example of WP:CRYSTAL. ~ mazca talk 11:51, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It may certainly be so, that it is highly likely the game will be made, but until this is verifiable then WP:CRYSTAL firmly applies. WilliamH (talk) 14:20, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete entirely made of origial research and extrapolation. Martarius (talk) 14:56, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not a crystal ball. JIP | Talk 17:13, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:22, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.