Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marilyn Levine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. WP:SK point 1. joe decker ^talk 17:37, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Marilyn Levine

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability -- fails WP:ARTIST (Side note: This article was created as a part of this meetup: Wikipedia:Meetup/Regina/ArtAndFeminism 2016/University of Regina. The meetup seems to have produced a lot of articles of questionable quality/notability -- most of them have been deleted or have ongoing AfDs.) IagoQnsi (talk) 17:31, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There's a decent number of sources available: obituaries in the LA Times and New York Times, entry in The Canadian Encyclopedia, book sources: [1] [2] [3] [4] (unfortunately I can't read the full sections about her in those last two). I do believe this is enough to satisfy the general notability guideline. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 17:46, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:34, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:34, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:34, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:34, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Is this a joke? A New York Times obituary and an entry in an academic reference work, the Encyclopedia of Saskatchewan produced by the University of Regina. Gamaliel (talk) 15:30, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Passes GNG for sources showing in the footnotes, a New York Times obit and inclusion in the Encyclopedia of Saskatchewan. Carrite (talk) 15:50, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The sources are strong and she clearly was a notable sculptor. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 16:51, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
'Snow Keep' two encylopedia's independent of us, with coverage -- clearly enough, Sadads (talk) 17:08, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Six of the ongoing AfDs referred to in the nomination: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amber Dalton, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martha Cole, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marilyn Levine, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marsha Kennedy, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marilyn Levine and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iris Hauser have been initiated by IagoQnsi. The event where an article was created is not in itself a valid criterion for deletion. That articles should be deleted because related articles have been also been nominated for deletion is also not a valid criterion; The AfD procedure for deleting multiple pages does not apply here, and should not be used as an argument. Mduvekot (talk) 17:13, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I apologize, this AfD was a mistake. I move to keep and quickly close this discussion. -IagoQnsi (talk) 17:33, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.