Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mariel Pamintuan (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sam Walton (talk) 18:04, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mariel Pamintuan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sourced only to the network that employs her, spammy tone, dubious notability. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:20, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 16:30, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: as per @Jimfbleak analysis. Quis separabit? 03:29, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: I commented back in June during the first AfD that this article was relying too much on primary sources to try and establish Pamintuan's notability for a stand-alone Wikipedia article. At the time, I looked for more independent sources, but couldn't find any myself. So, I was willing to wait to see if someone else could before !voting in that AfD, but it was closed as a "no consensus". Since then nothing has really changed and better sources have not been provided, so I don't think this satisfies WP:BASIC at least not at this stage of Pamintuan's career. Maybe she'll be notable enough someday, but I think now is WP:TOOSOON. - Marchjuly (talk) 10:27, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Marchjuly (talk) 01:25, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Marchjuly (talk) 01:25, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:41, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 333-blue 07:33, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.