Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marica Linn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:53, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Marica Linn[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I've declined a WP:A7 request on this as it does contain credible claims of significance, but this is clearly not appropriate for a biography of a living person. What sources there are are to unreliable sources, and there doesn't appear to be sufficient coverage in reliable sources to construct a viable article. ‑ Iridescent 06:53, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Bands and musicians. ‑ Iridescent 06:53, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Vanity spam. Any award she's won in a non-notable competition isn't notable and her singles haven't charted. Oaktree b (talk) 17:27, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Fashion, and Ohio. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:56, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, lack of indepth third party coverage and winner of non-notable awards. AmirŞah 20:09, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Promotional vanity article. The awards are completely non-notable. Also, please note the SLR sources on the article are paid for; the promotional packages they offer can be found on their website here. --Kbabej (talk) 20:11, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - paid-for coverage doesn't make someone notable Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 05:36, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No significant coverage or indication of notability. JSFarman (talk) 00:28, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.