Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maribyrnong Greens Football Club
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. \ Backslash Forwardslash / (talk) 19:35, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Maribyrnong Greens Football Club[edit]
- Maribyrnong Greens Football Club (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article lacks sufficient Attribution for Verifiability of the WP:CORP notability criteria … {{Prod}} contested by author. — The Bipolar Anon-IP Gnome (talk) 14:11, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- - 2/0 (cont.) 16:06, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Appears not to be notable. I can't find sources in Google, Google News or anywhere. JohnWBarber (talk) 00:31, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. GiantSnowman 00:49, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - doesn't play in the league it claims to (Victorian State League). I can't find any sources either, so it's either a hoax or just remarkably non-notable. GiantSnowman 00:52, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Bduke (Discussion) 01:34, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete There's no evidence that this team meets WP:ORG Nick-D (talk) 07:56, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, they're a real team, but I haven't been able to find any evidence that they competed after 2007. Either way, they seem to just be an amateur/weekend thing, and there's not enough secondary sources to come up with a useful article. Lankiveil (speak to me) 21:36, 22 October 2009 (UTC).[reply]
- Delete - Doesn't meet the standards of notability for clubs Spiderone 17:17, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.