Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marianne Merchez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Procedural keep‎. These are not suitable to be discussed as a group. Feel free to re-nominate immediately, individually if there is merit. Star Mississippi 16:05, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Marianne Merchez[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG and I believe this is a case of WP:BLP1E. Delete as this astronaut is just an astronaut candidate not flown to space and wouldn't fly. As per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angad Pratap, astronaut candidate is notable if he/she is assigned a mission like Aleksandr Gorbunov (SpaceX Crew-8 just flew Alexander Grebenkin so out) or has flown to space, has dont anything else notable other than just being astronaut candidate. No improvement is there in this article since creation: WP:ATD-R Can be redirected to List of astronauts by year of selection#1992.—🪦VSVNB1058 (2020-2023) (TALK) 17:54, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adding more articles on researching —🪦VSVNB1058 (2020-2023) (TALK) 17:55, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Found after researching will report more if found

Collapsed list of notified projects for AFD readability. Schazjmd (talk) 19:01, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:34, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:35, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:35, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:35, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:35, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:37, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:47, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:47, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:47, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:48, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Biology-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:49, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:49, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:49, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:50, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:53, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:53, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:54, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:55, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:55, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They all seem to have slightly different additional notability (or not). Keep all, unsuitable for a mass nomination. —Kusma (talk) 18:59, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural keep all of these articles will require individual research into a WP:BEFORE search so a mass nomination is not appropriate. SportingFlyer T·C 19:05, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural keep unsuitable for a mass nomination. Also, someones job is not a single event. Furthermore, SIGCOV is what dictates their notability, not whether they have gone to space or not.Alvaldi (talk) 19:13, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spaceflight-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:50, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Procedural keep mass nominations is almost always a bad idea, with rare exception of trivially decided cases. - Altenmann >talk 19:53, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural keep: in general, biographies tend not to make good bundled nominations, given the wide variability in potential notability. That's not a recipe for the clear-cut deletion discussions based on existing policy bundled noms are supposed to be. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:00, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural keep: Poor WP:MULTIAFD nomination. Your interpretation of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angad Pratap's outcome is completely wrong and the WP:ATD-R suggestion does not apply for all the other nominations you have made. No improvement over the years does not mean they are not notable. It's evident that no WP:BEFORE search was done before the nomination, as I significantly expanded Valentin Filatyev from the first Google Books search result. You are clearly trying to "avenge" [1][2] WP:POINTY. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 20:11, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all per above – it's not feasible to try to evaluate all of these in one discussion, especially because some of them will likely require looking for sources in different languages to see if they meet GNG. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 11:55, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Oppose: sorry I subscribed the topic but no notifications arrived, so late reply. Wikipedia:ATD-R is good to add at these depreciated and spaceflight focusing articles where they didn't even flew for those missions. Still even if you think delete is harsh send them to draftspace, but these depreciated articles are clearly not ready for mainspace. —🪦VSVNB1058 (2020-2023) (TALK) 14:16, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural Keep per all the above. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 13:19, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.