Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marianne Ginther (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Newt Gingrich#Marriages and children. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 11:04, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Marianne Ginther[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article appears to be a case of WP:NOTINHERITED in that there is no independent notability demonstrated outside of her former marriage to Newt Gingrich. As she is already mentioned at the New Gingrich article, and as this is the extent of her notability, I attempted to redirect her article there, however the redirect was reverted. Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 18:31, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Newt Gingrich#Marriages and children - she is not notable in herself, and that's the most relevant place to redirect the article. ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 19:11, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Notability is not inherited. WP:NOTINHERITED Roodog2k (talk) 20:34, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect, the guys above said it all. rʨanaɢ (talk) 00:56, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as coverage of her is really coverage of Newt. I'd have suggested a merge but the content I expected to be here (open marriage thing, etc.) wasn't, so that can just be added separately. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 01:17, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:29, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect:I was to get all "hey, it's got four references, obvious keep" but then I actually checked them. 3 of the 4 are trivial mentions in articles about her husband—perfect examples of WP:NOTINHERITED. The first reference seems to be feature length, but it's behind a paywall, so I can't comment one way or the other on it. Regardless, coverage in one RS does not a notable person make. No demonstrated individual notability. Livit⇑^Eh?/_What? 02:55, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable —Eustress ^talk 23:01, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.