Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mariam Khalique

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:30, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mariam Khalique

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think just being schoolteacher of someone makes you notable. She fails to receive in-depth independent coverage. Fails WP:GNG. Greenbörg (talk) 18:01, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:42, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:42, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:42, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Week Delete I agree with the nominator. While the subject has no remarkable or notable career but because she has been namechecked in RS, I suggest week delete. --Saqib (talk) 20:25, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Clearly a worthy person but notability is not there yet. Xxanthippe (talk) 05:29, 6 October 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Delete per nom and above Fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 15:33, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG, no significant coverage to establish notability. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 06:04, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.