Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria Luisa Ugolini Bonta

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 10:57, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Maria Luisa Ugolini Bonta[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Fails WP:ARTIST. No evidence that she made any lasting contribution. Also, most of the article is unsourced, or refers to unpublished sources like her sketchbooks, journals, and letters and a biography written by Lydia Ugolini. A search for further sources turned up nothing notable. BenedictineMalediction (talk) 18:44, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I did some snooping around and was unable to find any reliable secondary sources, that cover the subject extensively, or any GLAMs that own her artwork. Based on where the photo came from..I think this was a piece written by a relative or someone with close connections to the subject (aka COI). As the founder of WikiProject Women artist's, I always take this very seriously, and hate having to say farewell to women who deserve coverage, but, alas, despite the lovely article, she does not appear to meet our general notability guidelines and those for WP:ARTIST. Missvain (talk) 18:35, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:55, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:44, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Missvain. Too few secondary sources to constitute notability. --Mr. Guye (talk) 21:17, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above. Neutrality^talk 06:31, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.