Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria Devigili

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 (talk) 20:55, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Maria Devigili[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Don't believe it meets WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG; can't find any significant coverage; no major awards for her work; doesn't seem to have charted anywhere; happy days, Lindsay^Hello 14:37, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. happy days, Lindsay^Hello 14:37, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Updated Lindsay^Hello Please forgive me for misdirected words. I am adding many new and also current links to newspaper, radio, and online coverage of Ms Devigili's Career. I look forward to updating Maria Devigili Wiki Page to suit the guidelines you will kindly help me resolve.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rxeno (talk • contribs) 19:17, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 20:44, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:12, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:55, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bait30 ^{Talk 2 me pls?} 07:13, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Added a complete rewrite of the history/story. Will follow up with reference updates and links cleaning. --- rxeno 03:12, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep The article is a mess and needs to be cleaned up - especially the many URLs throughout the article - however it has some potential if it can be tagged as needing work. --Micky (talk) 17:56, 20 June 2020 (UTC) Blocked sockpuppet Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:21, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cleaned up exposed url/links. Adding rewrites in the next days. Thank you for any input. --- rxeno 09:26, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.