Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria Davila
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Fritzpoll (talk) 20:02, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Maria Davila[edit]
- Maria Davila (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Fails WP:POLITICIAN - I can't find any indication that she is notable beyond being the mayor of a small city. Passportguy (talk) 22:19, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:52, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:52, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete 100,000 people is not a small city, but not really large enough (especially since it's in a huge metro area) to warrant automatic notability for its mayor. Nyttend (talk) 02:29, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Mayor of a U.S. city that large (100,000-plus) is surely notable no matter where it is located. Kestenbaum (talk) 03:36, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Mayors are not automatically notable. Unless there is significant coverage, which I'm not seeing, subject fails WP:POLITICIAN. لennavecia 13:27, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete oer nom, viz the Politician standard at BIO. Eusebeus (talk) 12:36, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.