Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Margot & the Nuclear So and So's (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. czar  03:06, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Margot & the Nuclear So and So's (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previous nomination was speedy closed due to Copvio. Notability question never got answered. Band does not seem to meet WP:NBAND or WP:GNG. - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 15:54, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 15:54, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 15:55, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 15:55, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To quote the WP:NBAND page

  • Has performed music for a work of media that is notable, e.g., a theme for a network television show, performance in a television show or notable film, inclusion on a notable compilation album, etc.

There's 4 of the qualifications right away. And there are more, but no specific sources (Margot's reputation as an Indianapolis band for example). Indyanapolis (talk) 18:45, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Some of the coverage given is a bit thin, but the PopMatters and Hybrid articles more than raise the curve in my mind. Likewise the 2 releases on Epic are different versions of the same album, but I still think that meets the spirit of BAND. Throw in the Heatseekers charting (which is one of Billboards numerous charts these days) and top off with appearing on Conan, and notability is well established in my mind. The sources listed above should also be inserted into the article, either as external links, or inline cites supporting the content, as the refs in the article now are sparse. CrowCaw 00:32, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.