Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Margaret Nichols (psychologist)

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2024 June 3.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:52, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Margaret Nichols (psychologist)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable. Fails GNG, prof. Promotional material. Banglange (talk) 14:45, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note previous AfD under a different title, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Margaret Nichols.—S Marshall T/C 15:47, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:13, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Does not pass WP:Prof#C1 with a GS h-index of only 12 in a highly cited field. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:31, 17 November 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Delete is not a highly impactful psychologist at the level that would be needed to pass our notability requirements for academics.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:43, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Does not fit any of the PROF or other relevant criteria. Media mentions are passing quotes, not coverage of her herself as the topic. — James Cantor (talk) 17:11, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.