Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marco Roberto Capelli

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 22:00, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Marco Roberto Capelli[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Created by WP:SPA and probably an autobiography, judging by creator's username. See also WP:Articles for deletion/Progetto Babele. Boleyn (talk) 12:26, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. — Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 15:18, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. — Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 15:18, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 15:18, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - His page in Italian WP was also deleted, for some reason. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 15:21, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That is not a valid argument for deletion. If you don't know why it was deleted from that wiki, you can't say that that deletion would have been compatible with our policies if it had happened here. That wiki may have policies that are different from ours. James500 (talk) 02:20, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article on the Italian Wikipedia was originally deleted on 21 November 2006 as a copyright violation of his entry on the Progetto Babele website. It was again deleted on 20 February 2007 at Afd for lack of notability. The third deletion was speedy on 3 April 2007 for being a simple recreation of the non-notable page of 20 February. The fourth deletion was by Afd on 30 March 2013 because even with the additionally added sources, it still failed their notability guidelines. --Bejnar (talk) 22:14, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:09, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:09, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 18:49, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete lack of significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Fails WP:NOTEBLP, fails WP:MUSIC. --Bejnar (talk) 22:14, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.