Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marco Lupis
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. --VS talk 10:50, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Marco Lupis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
non-notable, vanity, probable COI. Photo-journalists are journalists, that's part of what they do, that does not make this one notable. - Kittybrewster ☎ 16:25, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as nominator. Kittybrewster ☎ 08:55, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the Italy related deletion discussions. — Kittybrewster ☎ 09:18, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[quote]"Photo-journalists are journalists"[/quote] .....? What does it mean? I can't understand...
Any way, this person is mainly a journalist and then a photo-journalist but , once again, .... what does it mean??--Nosferamus (talk) 18:55, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
— Nosferamus (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Totallly false! --Nosferamus (talk) 23:31, 2 March 2008 (UTC)banned user. Jehochman Talk 13:13, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep if only because of the family background Dreamspy (talk) 18:29, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable. I see no evidence of substantial coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject, as is required by WP:BIO to demonstrate notability. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 09:01, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as creator. I found him notable enough to stay in Wikipedia.--Olitwist (talk) 15:22, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
— Olitwist (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.banned user. Jehochman Talk 13:13, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The guy is supposedly descended from Italian royalty, but that alone does not make him notable and his claim to be the Duke of San Donato has no real basis since the Italian monarchy was abolished over half a century ago. He may have some claim to notability outside of this, maybe the mere fact he claims he's a Duke is reason enough, but I imagine he doesn't.--The Devil's Advocate (talk) 20:45, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep For now, at least. Definitely needs more sources, which tough considering the language issue, but it seems that he might be borderline notable. faithless (speak) 06:12, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sources added --Nosferamus (talk) 11:55, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
banned user. Jehochman Talk 13:13, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - notability asserted with multiple sources etc. dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 09:39, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.