Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcio Delgado
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. No evidence of meeting WP:GNG/WP:BASIC. joe deckertalk to me 14:53, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Marcio Delgado (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
no sources that make a case for notability. Most are links to just the general work that can be expected of any journalist. Written like a resume by one person. --Vera (talk) 00:07, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:54, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:54, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:54, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- delete. Google hits find: wikipedia, wikipedia, myspace, facebook, something unrelated (?), his personal website, linkedin, twitter, a youtube video, and imdb in that order. I agree with the nominator that there's no notability here. IMDB in general can establish notability, but the actual page does not: [1] -- stillnotelf is invisible 18:52, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bmusician 09:02, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - apart from this very short paragraph subject seems to lack in-depth news coverage. It is claimed he fronted several TV shows, but the shows do not seem to be notable. Sionk (talk) 13:58, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: No significant coverage. SL93 (talk) 21:29, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.