Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcelo Cerqueira

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 09:00, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Marcelo Cerqueira

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article without references, eliminated in the lusophone Wikipedia. In short, Brazilian activist, pre-candidate for political positions, but nothing. Notoriety not evidenced. Le Comte Edmond Dantès ^msg 04:36, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 13:20, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 13:20, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 13:20, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non notable and fails WP:BIO scope_creep (talk) 16:27, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Being president of an organization, even a notable one, is not an automatic notability pass that entitles a person to keep an unsourced WP:BLP separately from already having his name mentioned in the organization's article anyway — he would have to clear WP:GNG on the depth and quality of reliable sourcing, but there isn't any here: the only "source" is a Q&A interview on a Blogspot blog, which is not a reliable or notability-assisting source for both Q&A and Blogspot reasons. As always, no prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can actually source him much better than this. Bearcat (talk) 17:03, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete interviews do not show notability, and that is the only source.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:59, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.