Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marc Martin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 14:23, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Marc Martin

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A lawyer doing his job, voicing opinions on a topic in his field - in this case net neutrality. The vast majority of sources are articles about net neutrality that have one or two sentences of quotes from him (i.e. less than 95% of the articles' contents). There are no tangible articles about the person other than corporate PR. This is insufficient to establish notability. All the personal data seems to have been taken from the profile at his place of work. This is not an independent source. There are also questions about the original conception of this article which indicate PR-cruft. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 08:23, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 08:24, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 08:24, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 08:24, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 08:24, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Individual does not meet the notability requirements. NoCOBOL (talk) 08:33, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG pretty clearly. GPL93 (talk) 19:24, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete we lack good coverage to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:10, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.