Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marc Lefebvre

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:49, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Marc Lefebvre[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:GNG with only some WP:ROUTINE coverage. Also is well below any criteria in WP:NHOCKEY as both a player and as coach with only being involved in low-level leagues and no awards (winning a low-level championship with a team is not an individual achievement). Yosemiter (talk) 17:33, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:29, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:29, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:29, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The leagues he's played in (EIHL, Eredevisie) are not ones that confer automatic inclusion rights on hockey players — per WP:NHOCKEY/LA, they can support notability under NHOCKEY #4, "Achieved preeminent honors in a lower minor or major junior league (all-time top ten career scorer or First Team All-Star)", but nothing stated or sourced here passes that criterion. Bearcat (talk) 23:54, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Another in the hundreds of NN articles created in open defiance of all notability guidelines (and for which the editor was, all too belatedly, community banned from new article creation), this undistinguished low-minor leaguer doesn't break the pattern. Ravenswing 03:27, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.