Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mara Rudman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. $Salvio giuliano$ 06:57, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mara Rudman

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. No substantial independent coverage. This article was rejected three times by AfC and the draft was deleted after six months.[1] A new page was created by a COI author without going through AfC. BruceThomson (talk) 06:54, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:35, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:35, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Politicians, and Law. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 02:29, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I have not yet formulated an opinion on her notability, but I just want to pre-empt the possibility that someone will claims notability through WP:PROF#C8 and "She was an editor-in-chief of Harvard Law School's Human Rights Journal". This is a student-run journal, not the sort of journal whose editor-in-chief position is given to an established academic in recognition of their leadership in its field. So it does not pass #C8. —David Eppstein (talk) 02:39, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete No notability at all, under any criteria. The article merely establishes that Mara Rudman exists, nothing more. Jeppiz (talk) 00:02, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 23:29, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.