Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maqsood-ul-Haq

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:16, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Maqsood-ul-Haq

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, nothing in my searches. Störm (talk) 19:58, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I'm sure that shouldn't have led to a misplaced link when I first added it. Strange. Anyway. Bobo . 20:00, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:21, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:21, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:21, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Technically passes NCRIC, but a first-class cricketer who played only in one game (more than 40 years ago) is unlikely to have the sort of coverage necessary to meet WP:GNG, and except for mentions in listings such as this, what search results I could (or rather, could not) find tend to confirm this assumption. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 17:25, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.