Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mappillai (1952 film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Mhhossein ^talk 15:41, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mappillai (1952 film)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Since this article was created by me during my days when I wasn't so good at avoiding copyvios, I feel it is better to delete it so I can recreate it afresh, a.k.a. the phoenix being reborn. The old copyvio revisions (basically, all older revisions) will anyway be deleted, so it's best to let the whole article be deleted; I have saved my revamp elsewhere and can recreate the article using it. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:00, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 06:48, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 06:48, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 06:48, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 06:48, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment If you’re going to recreate the article you can draft a new version in your sandbox and when you’re ready, blank the current article and replace it with your new text. You don’t need an AfD to do that. Mccapra (talk) 10:06, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Mccapra, I've already revamped the article, but okay how about this? I withdraw the AfD and instead put {{revdel}}? Because every revision has copyvio content (don't define me by my past), I believe they have to be deleted. Kailash29792 (talk) 10:32, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment AfD is for articles that allegedly don't belong on Wikipedia. Withdraw the nom, fix the article, and move on. XeroxKleenex (talk) 15:10, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.