Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maplewiki

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 10:20, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maplewiki

Contested prod; a reason for contesting was given on Talk:Maplewiki (effectively the Pokemon test), but I disagree; Alexa worse than 1000000, no real assertions of notability. --ais523 10:13, 1 September 2006 (U T C)

Delete - No secondary sources given/found. Less than 40 unique google hits. Wickethewok 13:24, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no reliable sources WilyD 14:10, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If I were to reattach this to Mapletip.com, the maplewiki.net domain was RECENTLY purchased as you can see on Whois, therefore the Alexa ranking is DEFINETLY low. And also, unique google hits will also be low due to the newness. When Maplewiki was attached to Mapletip, it obtained MANY articles with many people helping every day. But now, you are going with a new domain that was recently purchased for Maplewiki. Please reconsider. Sources, are of coures in the Maplewiki itself.

 Registered through: GoDaddy.com, Inc. (http://www.godaddy.com)
 Domain Name: MAPLEWIKI.NET
  Created on: 18-Aug-06
  Expires on: 18-Aug-07
  Last Updated on: 19-Aug-06

Source

-- Mapletip 15:10, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but that still fails WP:V - which cannot be overcome by editor's concensus. WilyD 15:16, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, so you mean the articles itself are unreliable as in no sources? If you're talking about the monster database the source is Mapletip itself, which is very relibale as we have built it ourselves. Please before you delete tell me what is 'unreliable'. 68.78.148.16 16:20, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:RS and WP:V if it's unclear to you , but the articles doesn't cite any reliable, third party sources. In general, Maplewiki is not an authenticating source. WilyD 16:31, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Very well, delete it for now, I will remake the article when we fix the issue. Mapletip 18:43, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.