Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maoist Theory of Race Relations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. As author has stated that they are working on this article in their sandbox, and there is no objection to deletion, I have deleted it under Speedy G7 PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 00:40, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Maoist Theory of Race Relations

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Page is currently a list with no content Meatsgains (talk) 02:24, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:07, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:07, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Nonsense article consisting only of formatting, redlinks and blue links. Creator's user page says "This user is a student editor in UCSD/HIGR_210_Socialism_in_China_(2017_Fall)" so possibly this should be in a sandbox or something rather than mainspace. Might be a candidate for speedy deletion G2? Neiltonks (talk) 13:11, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: It looks like this is something that the student is in the process of expanding and they've saved a copy of this to their sandbox. I'll talk with the student about creating drafts in the mainspace along with other concerns. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 13:17, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per author request [1][2] and lack of content (beyond section headings) and sources.Icewhiz (talk) 13:53, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete no content to judge. D4iNa4 (talk) 15:45, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.