Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mao (singer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:24, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mao (singer)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence that this is in any way a notable person. Appears to be a normal guy doing a variety of jobs publishing his own records and reading the traffic news on TV. The only ref shows that he exists but shows no evidence of notability. Self promotion perhaps ? Fails WP:GNG Velella ^{Velella Talk} 13:38, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am the official biographer. All information provided is 100% correct. I would be extremely grateful if you could kindly let me know how to solve any doubt\alarm in order to finalise a clean page. Many thanks for the kind cooperation in advance. Maoelarivoluzione—Preceding undated comment added 21:32, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment A large portion of the article has been removed as a copyvio, leaving the large list that's currently there. — Gestrid (talk) 23:33, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:54, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:54, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:56, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:56, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User was paid to promote. Fails WP:GNG CRAuser (talk) 00:37, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No significant independent reliable sources have been provided. Almost a speedy delte as promotional. DES ^(talk) 01:15, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:29, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Almost promotional, No significant sources provided.Wiki Cell (talk) 08:35, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:INDISCRIMINATE. — O Fortuna^{semper crescis, aut decrescis} 14:00, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.