Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manuela Darling-Gansser

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Despite the SPAs, the notability concerns have been addressed with sources. Spellcast (talk) 02:06, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Manuela Darling-Gansser[edit]

This article was originally speedy-deleted under CSD A7. DRV overturned, finding an assertion of notability was present, and also finding more sources, for which see the DRV. Still, delete, given continued notability concerns, and pending other opinions. Xoloz (talk) 16:33, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per Notability Marlith ^T/C 17:50, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - unless major improvements in the sourcing of these assertions (where on TV, ISBN #'s for published works, third party bios of her?) show up during this discussion. Keeper | 76 18:04, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Nix it- post haste.---Iconoclast.Horizon (talk) 06:40, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep See sources added, ISBN # provided as well as other users now contributing to the article.--Birri85 (talk) 03:09, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
DON'T DELETE!she is a celebrity cook in her own country and fast becoming a figure head of the slow food movement. plus she has 2 more books at the publishers to be released this year! please!--Viv G (talk) 04:12, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
KeepI'm finding it difficult to understand why the article is under question. I'm under the impression that wikipedia is an open source encyclopedia that features and presents relevant information from the masses to the masses. I understand the need to maintain tight screening but Manuela seems to have more than enough supportive material to confirm her credibility.--Greg Devine (talk) 04:39, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

note to closing admin; the three "keep" votes so far have been added by SPA accounts. The article is improving through these accounts though. Keeper | 76 15:49, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.