Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manson Girls
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Once more information is released as it goes into production then it can be recreated. It doesn't meet our standards right now though. Wizardman 17:21, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Manson Girls[edit]
- Manson Girls (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Future film that is in the real early stages. Doesn't meet the requirements of WP:NFF. brewcrewer (yada, yada) 18:36, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Notable film starring notable actress(Lindsey Lohan). I changed the source to a reliable one. Searching lohan+manson on brings up 95 google news hits. --SmashvilleBONK! 19:13, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:NFF requires a source that shooting has begun. Until then, everything should be merged to Charles Manson or Linsday Lohan. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 19:31, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment It's listed on IMDB; I've added the link to the article. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 19:24, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:14, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge → Charles Manson#Manson and culture and tag with Template:R from merge. Echoing User:Brewcrewer, general consensus as reflected in guideline is that future films are not sufficiently notable for stand-alone articles until they have started shooting. Included in the reasoning behind this is that once shooting has started, contracts are in place and money is certain to be on the table and actors are committed and must (should) decline conflicting offers, so that terminating the film or going forward with it each have documented and notable outcomes. However, there is little reason to deleted the content, which is why I suggest the merger. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:34, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hersfold (t/a/c) 17:41, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and merge relevant content as per WP:NFF and above comments. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 02:41, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with Lindsay Lohan per Brewcrewer. In this case, IMDB simply states that Lohan's participation is "rumored" (and no further), thus it cannot for the time being be used as a "reliable source" here (some would argue that IMDB is not a reliable source at any time, but that's beside the point here). The Herald-Sun article is the only one shown in the article; independent, multiple sources are needed. The merge will be best until there is enough to satisy WP:V without making a crystal ball article. B.Wind (talk) 04:11, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.