Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manitoba China Times

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:05, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Manitoba China Times

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced since 2006. Fails WP:GNG. The best source I could find was this entry in a database of minority media, but I couldn't find any other usable sources. – Teratix ₵ 23:35, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. – Teratix ₵ 23:38, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. – Teratix ₵ 23:38, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. – Teratix ₵ 23:38, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. – Teratix ₵ 23:38, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Manitoba-related deletion discussions. – Teratix ₵ 23:38, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. – Teratix ₵ 23:40, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

del nonnotable printed freebie. Staszek Lem (talk) 23:48, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.