Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manic Digger
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 00:29, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Manic Digger[edit]
- Manic Digger (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not a notable software, really outdated, and the article is written as a guide rather than as an article Wjykk (talk) 20:00, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 23:51, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 23:51, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SwisterTwister talk 01:35, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MacMedtalkstalk 03:55, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Software that's still under development. I can't see anything that looks like a reliable source. --Colapeninsula (talk) 11:10, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I could not find any reliable independent source covering the game. Del per WP:GNG. --Odie5533 (talk) 03:41, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no reliable 3rd party refs to establish notability of this software. Dialectric (talk) 14:32, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.