Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mangpor Chonthicha

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:53, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mangpor Chonthicha

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

possibly fails WP:BIO. Rob3512 _chat? ^{what I did} 17:38, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 17:48, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 17:48, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 17:48, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 17:48, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 17:49, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:29, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:30, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Soft delete All languages of this article have the same issue: they are stubs that rely on the same 3 inadequate sources. At this time it seems like there is not enough significant coverage to keep the article. Trillfendi (talk) 19:15, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep a notable singer when her peak around 10 years ago. News coverage from Thai Rath (Thailand number one newspaper): [1] I can count 14 news there available online dated from 2010 to 2018. Clicking on each photo brings full-length news article. Google news search: [2] shows the variety of news coverage from respectable Thai newspapers. --Lerdsuwa (talk) 08:44, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per the significant coverage in multiple reliable sources identified above as per WP:NEXIST the subject easily passes WP:BASIC and deserves to be included in the encyclopedia (which is also available in print and apps so it's not just a website), thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 16:49, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 18:41, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MrClog (talk) 20:39, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - looking at the references they all appear to be online tabloid/gossip sources that do not provide significant coverage in reliable sources as per WP:GNG and WP:BASIC - has not "received a well-known and significant award or honor" as per WP:ANYBIO - does not meet WP:SINGER (has not "been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable", has not "had a single or album on any country's national music chart", has not "had a record certified gold or higher in at least one country", has not "received non-trivial coverage in independent reliable sources of an international concert tour, or a national concert tour", etc.) - therefore, delete - Epinoia (talk) 03:07, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- You are wrong Thai Rath is a national broadsheet newspaper not a tabloid at all Atlantic306 (talk) 21:39, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Lerdsuwa. The amount of recent coverage of her personal life alone is enough to satisfy the WP:GNG. --Paul_012 (talk) 05:56, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.