Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mandaluyong local elections, 2016

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 23:53, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mandaluyong local elections, 2016

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable local event. Article such as this have already been deleted. KDS4444^Talk 15:39, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 16:25, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. - supergabbyshoe
Keep Mandaluyong is larger than many English districts and towns for which we have complete sets of election articles (e.g. Category:Council elections in Bolton Borough or Category:Tunbridge Wells Council elections (it is more than double the size of Tunbridge Wells)), and on which there is consensus that the elections are notable. Deleting the Mandaluyong article would be a clear case of systematic bias against non-English speaking countries. I have restored the speedily deleted Malabon article as the city is even larger, and the article is no different to East Hertfordshire District Council election, 2015. Number 5 7 21:41, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Passes the basic requirements of WP:NEVENT and WP:V.--RioHondo (talk) 00:55, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.